연구 요약
연구 요지 (AI)
공유재산 불법점유의 점유 회복방안을 연구했다.
초록
Through the growth of the market and civil society, a recent reform intends to ‘small but efficient government’ and this has been realized by supplying the administrative services by the private, which is originally supplied by the administration. City of Junju also permits the private to provide some of public services which was supplied by Junju. For example, Junju allows the private to possess and use a resting place ofa zoo owned by Junju.
Even though the permitted use period has been expired and the resting place of the zooin the city part which is the administrative property civilians who have run the resting place has not returned it yet. According to Article 6 of the Law of Management of Public Property and Products, it regulates that nobody can use or get benefits from public properties without any permission by a local government head and article 81 of the same law regulates to impose tender if a person owns, uses, or benefits from the public property without any permission and article 83 of the same law regulates that the removal or other actions can be taken to them based on article 3 or article 6 of the Administrative Execution Law if people own the public property or install facilities without the legitimate reason. Based on the articles above, therefore, according to the procedures by the Administrative Execution Law, the Mayor of Junju seems to enable to remove the detention and recover the possession from people who possess the resting place of thezoo without any legitimate reason because the permitted period has been expired.
However, the Supreme Court decided that the possession of the person who possesses illegally the resting place which is the facility of the city park is not the subject of execution by the Administrative Execution by the intendance. Due to the judgment of the Supreme Court, after Junju had to bring an eviction suit against illegal occupants, it has recovered its possession through an executor under the Civil Affairs Execution Law.
Nevertheless, the illegal occupants have used the resting place illegally at least 2 years from the expiration date to the execution date. Because of that, Junju could not manage and supervise the resting place of the zoo and it eventually caused inconvenience to citizens who wantedto use the park facilities under the fresh environment. Moreover, the illegal occupants have hidden their properties and earnings while failing to pay the hire and it makes not to collect taxes by force.
Because it has affected the serious deduction of city’s tax revenue, it is severely prejudicial to the public interest. This research is intended to find the legal basis to help the local government head to recover the possession of public property which has been occupied illegally and additionally to study an alternative plan of possession recovery and reorganization of relevant laws by understanding the legal characteristics of using the public property and permitting benefits from it and reinterpreting the relationship of the purpose of article 83 of the Law of Management of Public Property and Products and the nature of the Administrative Execution.
목차
제1장 서론 = 1 제1절 연구의 목적 = 1 제2절 연구의 범위 및 방법 = 3 제2장 전주시 동물원 내 휴게소의 사용관계 = 5 제1절 공유재산의 사용관계 = 5 Ⅰ. 공물의 개념 = 5 Ⅱ. 공물의 법률적 특성 = 6 1. 공소유권설 = 6 2. 사소유권설 = 6 3. 우리 실정법상의 공물의 법률적 특색 = 7 (1) 융통성(처분 등)의 제한 = 7 (2) 강제집행의 제한 = 7 (3) 취득시효의 제한 = 8 (4) 공용수용의 제한 = 8 (5) 기타 = 8 Ⅲ. 공물의 사용관계 = 9 1. 공물의 자유사용 및 허가사용 = 9 (1) 자유사용 = 9 (2) 허가사용 = 10 2. 특허사용 = 10 (1) 의의 = 10 (2) 특허사용의 성질 = 10 (3) 특허사용자의 권리 = 11 (4) 특허사용자의 의무 = 11 제2절 행정재산의 목적 외 사용 = 12 Ⅰ. 의의 = 12 Ⅱ. 행정재산의 목적 외 사용허가의 법적 성질 = 12 1. 공유재산 및 물품관리법의 연역 = 12 2. 행정재산의 목적 외 사용허가의 법적 성질 = 14 (1) 공법관계설 = 14 (2) 사법관계설 = 15 (3) 이원적 법률관계설 = 15 (4) 판례 및 소결 = 17 제3절 전주시 동물원 내 휴게소의 사용관계 = 18 Ⅰ. 전주시 동물원 휴게소의 공물성 = 18 1. 동물원내 휴게소의 법적지위 = 18 2. 동물원내 휴게소의 사용허가의 적법성 = 19 3. 동물원내 휴게소의 사용허가의 법적성질 = 19 제3장 사용·수익 허가 철회에 따른 조치 = 21 제1절 행정상 강제집행 = 21 Ⅰ. 의의 = 21 1. 민사상 강제집행과의
발행 정보
2009. 전북대학교 법무대학원 국내석사 학위논문