土地行政法상 買收請求制度에 관한 연구

토지 매수청구제도를 통해 토지재산권 보호와 제한의 조화를 모색했다.

This article started from the recognition of reconciliation of restrictions and protection of the land property rights. Based on accurate understandings of the purchase claim system which guarantees the property rights, this article aims at seeking the integrity on security of the land property rights. Land is an indispensable element for life and productions and also limited resources. In addition, an increase in population and industrialization has been making its value bigger and bigger. In a word, it can be said that land is more important than the others. This definition is directly linked with characteristics of the land from other commodities.

Consequently, the land includes restrictions of sociality or social binding. Because the constitution clearly states that the security and use of the private property rights have to proper to the public interests. For all that, the government can not force a landowner to make the special sacrifice for this social binding that could infringe on the essential substance of the land property rights. In case of public expropriation which causes the deprivation of property rights, the compensation shall be paid. And restriction of exceeded social binding has to be done by the same way. (para.3 of Art.

23 of the law) Regarding the restrictions of the property rights for the public interests, there are no special compensation regulations properly while considering the landowner to bear social restrictions. In these circumstances, the purchase claim system is arranged for arbitration of the property rights between the social restrictions and the restrictions of the special sacrifice. In this thesis, the author searched out unnecessary bureaucratic operations and the imperfection of the land property right security within the land purchase processes because of no proper regulations on the use of purchase claim rights.

Consequently, I insist that, we need to introduce a concept of 'the priority system' to the purchase claim system as a reform measure.

But there is a possibility of inequality between landowners on account of the priority, so the author is of the opinion that the diverse study on impartiality of it case by case. In addition, I may dare say that relaxation of conditions of the purchase claim rights and realization of compensation payments are needed on the basis of the actual conditions of the operations. Considering that there are few constitutional studies on the purchase claim system, this article is an academic one, thus calls for theoretical and practical discussions on the purchase claim system afterwards.

Key Word : the purchase claim system land property rights social binding public expropriation property rights the priority system

第1章 序 論 第1節 硏究의 背景 및 目的 1 第2節 硏究의 範圍 3 第2章 土地財産權의 公法的 接近 第1節 토지재산권의 意義 5 I. 토지재산권의 意味 5 1. 財産權 5 (1) 所有權과의 區別 5 (2) 헌법상 재산권의 類型과 範圍(客體) 6 2. 토지재산권의 槪念 7 3. 토지재산권의 特性 7 4. 토지재산권의 歷史的 變遷 9 II. 토지재산권의 內容 및 範圍 11 第2節 재산권의 保障 및 限界 12 I. 재산권 보장의 意義 12 1. 재산권 보장의 法的 性格 12 2. 재산권 보장의 內容 13 (1) 私有財産制度의 보장 13 (2) 私有財産權의 보장 14 3. 재산권 보장의 법적 근거 15 II. 재산권 보장의 限界 15 1. 재산권의 制限과 限界 15 (1) 의미 15 (2) 헌법 제23조 제1항 제2문의 법적성격 16 2. 재산권의 社會羈束性(社會的 拘束性) 17 第3節 토지재산권의 制限 19 I. 재산권의 제한 19 1. 의의 19 (1) 헌법 제23조 제1항과 제2항 19 (2) 헌법 제23조 제3항 20 2. 제23조 제1항·제2항과 제3항과의 關係 20 (1) 경계이론 20 (2) 분리이론 21 (3) 검토 22 3. 制限의 目的-公共必要에 관하여 24 (1) 공공필요의 개념 24 (2) 학설과 판례 24 (3) 小結 25 4. 재산권 제한의 型式 26 (1) 법률에 의한 제한 26 (2) 不可分條項 26 5. 재산권 제한의 限界 27 (1) 本質的 內容侵害禁止 27 (2) 過剩禁止의 原則(比例의 原則) 28 (3) 平等의 原則 29 (4) 信賴保護의 原則 29 II. 토지재산권 제한 30