도시재개발사업 의사소통의 합리성

도시재개발사업의 의사결정 과정에서 의사소통의 합리성을 살펴본다.

Urban redevelopment projects cause serious conflicts as the business progresses with lack of understanding and consensus among stakeholders. The purpose of this study is to investigate the rationality of communication in decision-making process of urban renewal projects in the Jeju City. The analysis data were qualitative in-depth interviews and minutes of the Jeju Special Self-governing Council. In order to analyze the cause of the dismissal urban renewal projects in the Jeju City, the analytical framework was i)the comprehensibility of the communication, ii)sincerity, iii)the legitimacy, iv)the truthfulness, ⅴ)the equity and ⅵ)the fairness.

As a result of analysis, i)In terms of the comprehensibility of communication, the project was carried out in a full development mode without understanding the history of the center and the identity of the residents. ⅱ)In terms of sincerity, public institutions were not able to provide accurate information and opinions to local residents. ⅲ)In terms of legitimacy, the development body ignored the identity of local residents and pursued development considering only the economic aspect. ⅳ)In terms of truth, public institutions did not inform the residents of the fact that they had no economic feasibility and the problem of development method.

ⅴ)In terms of equity, the opinions of the residents and self-employed were ignored because of the complexity of the interests between the Business entity. ⅵ)In terms of fairness, Socioeconomically vulnerable class were excluded from communication Urban redevelopment projects are carried out according to plan and plans should be established by communicating with participants in order to prevent conflicts in advance. In addition, communication between participants should be based on rationality and mutual consideration should be made to create the public sphere among participants