공영택지개발사업의 민간참여 확대방안에 관한 연구

공영택지개발사업의 민간참여 확대 방안을 연구했다.

The rational improvement measures for public housing land development should be based on the public interest and approached from the viewpoint of efficient national land development. Through these, the balanced regional development should be devised and furthermore, the national competitiveness reinforced. However, in spite of this necessity, our current housing land development policy has the problems, including causing regional imbalance and violating consumers' interest, due to the government- and Capital area-centered policy. The purpose of this thesis is to suggest various plans for participation of private sectors in public land development programs.

To to this, this study analyzes three aspects: license procedures, the main body of housing development programs, and degree of balanced development. Results of analysis show several problems. First, the current housing land development policy has the problems in the license procedures. In particular, as the public housing land development was implemented by governments owing to all sorts of regulations and procedures, the unfair distribution of benefit attendant upon development and excessive burden by people have occurred.

Second, the government-initiated housing land development programs and the large-scale, the high-density and the multi-family housing-oriented developments resulted in not coping with the demand of housing lands. Third, owing to the overemphasis on development of the Capital area, the green zone within it was damaged seriously and the living environment of entire cities was threatened. In order to solve these problems this study suggests the following as: First, all sorts of regulations should be removed and the simplification of procedures guaranteed legally so that private companies could participate actively in the public housing land development programs.

Second, the demander-centered housing land development should be implemented by enabling private companies to participate actively in the housing land development enterprises. Finally, it is necessary to change the paradigm of development: that is, from the housing land development to the city development, from a housing land development enforcer to a city growth manager, and the from the housing land development to the city planning.

In conclusion, in order to activate private companies' participation in the public housing land development, it is necessary to persuade public opinion, and it should be approached with considerable period so that Korea Land Corporation, Korea National Housing Corporation, and local governments can cope with the change of circumstances. In the aspect of private housing construction companies, it should be considered whether they have the ability and capital to participate in the current public housing land development programs.