지방자치단체 공유재산의 활용방안에 관한 연구

지방자치단체 공유재산의 활용 방안을 연구했다.

According to the 2020 fiscal self-reliance survey of local governments by the Ministry of Public Administration and Security, the national average degree of fiscal independence has significantly decreased from 59.4% in 2000 to 50.4% in 2020. The reason for this is that the local government’s finances have deteriorated significantly due to the expansion of the social welfare-related budget and the expansion of various subsidies due to COVID-19. Therefore, there is an increasing need for local governments to more effectively use public property in order to secure insufficient independent financial resources. Public property is divided into administrative property and ordinary property.

Administrative property is property used by local governments for administrative purposes, and in principle, judicial management, i.e., loan, sale, transfer, trust, and establishment of private powers for the purpose of investment are prohibited. In order for the private sector to conduct any kind of business, it is necessary to obtain permission to use it within the scope that does not deviate from its purpose as an administrative property, or to think about changing it into ordinary property. Common property can be broadly classified into three categories: ① building, ② infrastructure, and ③ plant.

In the case of ② infrastructure and ③ plant, there are many facilities where installers and operation managers are intertwined on a large scale. On the other hand, ① building-based public facilities, so-called ‘boxes’, are small and medium-sized and are maintained, operated and managed independently by local governments. Local governments generally recognize the local government's financial resources claimed by previous researchers. In the past, local governments simply maintained and preserved public property.

However, in recent years, as the local government's finances are getting worse day by day, there is a growing interest in not only expanding local finances by using public property more efficiently but also in revitalizing the local economy. Nevertheless, it was found that the local government was unable to efficiently utilize the public property due to various conditions. According to a survey by the Board of Audit and Inspection, there were about 40,000 cases of illegal possession of public property by local governments per year as of 2002, and it is estimated that there are many cases of unauthorized possession that the management department has not yet grasped.

The government improved the system conditions by amending the Public Property and Goods Management Act to efficiently manage the local government's public property and support its utility. For one example, the entrusted management and development system was introduced to entrust the affairs of general property so that the entrusted institution could develop the entrusted property. Therefore, in order to maximize the efficiency and efficiency of the management of the public property, the local government should prepare the conditions for the efficient operation of the public property of the local government, such as by amending the relevant ordinances of the local government.

Therefore, this paper intends to present the systemic, policy, and operational problems of the improved common property management plan. Until recently, many previous studies have been made to improve problems in the management of public property, but most of these studies so far have focused on institutional introduction and partial awareness of problems rather than specific and structural understanding and approaches to the system. Policy alternatives for management or review of detailed methodologies that can be used in practice are insufficient, and improvement plans are mainly presented at the basic level.

In addition, research on Chungcheongnamdo in terms of subjects and scope of research is rare, and it deals with issues such as information systems and management organizations for common property management in detail. Therefore, it is differentiated from this study, which seeks to find efficient management or detailed utilization methods by the newly introduced system operation methods such as trust method or consignment management/development. Looking at the major prior studies, there is a recent study that tried to improve the efficiency by improving the information system.

In this study, starting from the recognition of problems in the existing National Financial Information System (NAFIS) in relation to the management of public property, this study studied a method for efficient management of public property using the cadastral study management system (PLMAS). Through the research, an information management system was developed that could manage drawings for public land, statistical and analysis functions, and linkage with other systems, and through this, management by topic, loan status management, and data processing methods were presented.

In the preceding study, research was conducted focusing on the management organization system to improve the management problem of state-owned hybrid properties, and a case study was conducted focusing on the management of state-owned hybrid properties in Seongbukgu, Seoul. As a result of the study, basic directions and prior tasks were presented for efficient utilization, such as rearranging publicly owned hybrid properties, specialization and computerization of property management, and strengthening the expertise of those in charge of management tasks.

In the course of the research, a survey form for the state public land was prepared, and the problems and actual conditions of the management of the public land were widely presented through field surveys and resident surveys. In addition to these studies, a number of studies discuss the problem of management of public property and rationalization of management, but in-depth research on specific alternatives, detailed implementation plans for active utilization, and related