區分地上權에 관한 硏究

도시의 지하·공중 공간 이용을 위한 구분지상권 제도를 연구했다.

In the traditional system of land use, the sectional and plane use of land had been made the object, but later it's been required to grope the plan that use only underground or the air, as a method of overcoming the limit of land supply caused by urbanization. In that sense, we can say that the introduction of superficies division system is very timely in promoting the efficiency of space use, but the frequency in use is very low except public institution's subway construction or power-transmission line construction. The primary reason for that is within the various restriction and social convention that still think land use only in the plane way, not in the space-application viewpoint.

Therefore, I suppose that landowner should change the recognition on land use, and also by complementing current systems, the landowner protection method should be legalize for the landowner who established superficies division system to be able to submit the current restriction.

As one of the methods, I suggest that ; the new method should be legislated that the man of superficies division cannot perform the purchase claim right, if the landowner doesn't want renew, when the year is occupied when divided the provisional(false) price of the building or other structure which the man of superficies division into annual paid price (namely, offset year), or the year is occupied when a investment money and a paid price offset (of course, of not the offset year, the purchase claim right can be performed).

The other reason that superficies division is hardly used, is the law system which restricts a private right settlement, such as the National Property Lay or Road Law Therefore, I suppose that, as economic subject, public institute should be in the legal position with a civilian and make a civilian perform the private right like legal Superficies. For that, public institute first should arrange and reexamine totally various law system. Furthermore, set aside superficies division law, the that underground or the air can be used independently, irrelevant to landownership, should be prepared.

So far, underground development was performed individually and recklessly, but in the national dimension as well as seoul city dimension, "underground city program" should be systematically performed for the long run. And to prepare for the impending competition of the air space use, I suppose the las on the air space right should be established. In the end, the more the urbanization heightens, the more the demand for nature-affinity increases. So, to own trees in load's up-and-down space, not only building and other structures but also trees should be included in the content of superficies division right, also we should open the more wide way to use superficies division right.

목차 第1章 序論 = 1 第1節 硏究의 目的 = 1 第2節 硏究의 範圍 및 方法 = 4 I. 硏究의 範圍 = 4 II. 硏究의 方法 = 5 第2章 區分地上權에 관한 一般理論 = 6 第1節 區分地上權의 意義 및 法的 性質 = 6 I. 區分地上權의 意義 = 6 II. 區分地上權의 法的 性質 = 6 1. 區分地上權의 物權性 = 6 2. 地上權으로서의 區分地上權 = 6 3. 建物 其他 工作物을 所有할 權利 = 7 4. 地上 또는 地下의 區分層을 使用하는 權利 = 9 第2節 各國의 地上權에 관한 立法例 = 10 I. 序言 = 10 II. 英國法 = 11 III. 日本 民法 = 11 1. 區分地上權制度의 新設 = 11 2. 區分地上權의 性質 = 12 3. 區分地上權의 內容 = 12 4. 第3者의 土地利用權과의 關係 = 12 5. 區分地上權의 客體인 區分層의 範圍 變更 = 13 IV. 獨逸 民法 = 14 V. 스위스 民法 = 15 VI. 프랑스 民法 = 15 第3節 區分地上權의 客體 = 16 I. 區分層의 區分 方法 = 16 II. 區分層의 變更 = 18 1. 區分地上權의 客體인 層의 範圍 變更 = 18 2. 區分地上權과 普通地上權과의 相互 轉換 = 19 第4節 區分地上權의 效力 = 19 I. 土地使用制限의 特約 = 19 II. 權利行使의 妨害禁止 = 21 III. 區分地上權이 미치지 못하는 土地部分의 使用權 = 21 1. 土地所有者와 區分地上權者 間의 利用調節 = 22 2. 第3者의 土地利用權과의 調節 = 23 IV. 區分地上權에 기하여 設置된 工作物의 所有權 歸屬 = 28 V. 區分地上權 消滅의 效果 = 28 1. 區