부동산 점유취득시효제도의 법리 = Legal Principles in the acquisitive prescription system of Real Property by Possession

부동산 점유취득시효의 법리와 소유자·점유자 관계를 검토했다.

An acquisitive prescription is recognized as a legal right regardless of correspondence with a true ownership if certain constant occupation lasts for a long time. Under capitalism, it just protects the occupant who may not be a real owner, besides it excludes owner who is registered. There are raised moral questions about this. However, most countries have adopted an acquisitive prescription as measures which can solve the troubles between owners and occupants to protect trusts among traders who believe in continuous occupation since the Roman law. In this paper, I covered only an acquisitive prescription system of real property by possession out of positive prescription systems.

Because there are not many problems about an acquisitive prescription system of movables and an registration prescription of real property in point of view of legislation or interpretation. I dealt with purpose of study, range of study in the first chapter and history of prescription, comparison of a prescription system among Roman, German, France, Japan, England, USA and Korea in the second chapter.

Next, grounds of an acquisitive prescription system of real property by possession's existence as theoretical study in general, requirement of prescription and a right of claim of registration transfer of ownership as effects of an acquisitive prescription of real property by possession's completion in the third chapter and study about problems and unconstitutionality of an acquisitive prescription system, improvement of an acquisitive prescription system of real property by possession in the forth chapter. Lastly, I summarized previous chapters in the fifth chapter.

From now on, an acquisitive prescription system of real property by possession can prevent occupants, owners and third parties from unnecessary arguments followed by expectation on ambiguous possibilities by enacting laws about examining ontic truth referring to indicated points of precedents and theories. Moreover, I expect it to be developed while it meets the need of the times conscience of ordinary people.

제1장 서론 1 제1절 연구의 목적 1 제2절 연구의 범위와 방법 4 제2장 취득시효제도의 비교법적 고찰 5 제1절 연혁 5 Ⅰ. 로마법 5 1. 사용취득 5 2. 장기점유의 항변 8 3. 최장기점유의 항변 10 Ⅱ. 게르만법 10 1. 침묵의 제도 10 2. ‘시초를 알 수 없을 만큼 오래전부터’ 라는 제도 11 제2절 외국의 입법례 11 Ⅰ. 독일 11 1. 등기부취득시효 12 2. 이른바 공시최고취득시효 13 Ⅱ. 프랑스 15 1. 단기취득시효 16 2. 장기취득시효 18 Ⅲ. 일본 20 1. 장기취득시효 21 2. 단기취득시효 23 Ⅳ. 영미 25 1. 출소기한법 25 2. Common Law상의 묵인과 해태의 경우 27 3. 취득시효 28 Ⅴ. 각국의 취득시효제도의 검토 29 1. 취득시효의 요건 29 2. 취득시효의 효과 30 제3절 우리 민법상 부동산 취득시효제도의 입법과정 31 Ⅰ. 조선시대의 정소기한제도 31 Ⅱ. 입법배경 32 Ⅲ. 취득시효제도의 특징 33 제3장 부동산 점유취득시효제도의 이론적 검토 35 제1절 부동산 취득시효제도의 존재이유 및 유형 35 Ⅰ. 존재이유 35 1. 학설 35 2. 판례 37 3. 검토 37 Ⅱ. 취득시효의 유형 39 1. 부동산 점유취득시효 39 2. 부동산 등기부취득시효 40 3. 동산 소유권의 취득시효 40 4. 소유권의 이외의 재산권의 취득시효 41 제2절 부동산 점유취득시효의 요건 42 Ⅰ. 주체와 대상 43 1. 주체 43 2. 대상 43 Ⅱ. 자주점유 46 1. 자주점유의 판단 46 2. 무단점유 49 Ⅲ. 평온·공연한 점유 52 Ⅳ. 점유취득시효