登記請求權에 관한 硏究 : 假登記를 中心으로 = (A) study on the claim to Registration in the transter of Rights in Immovables : Taking a serious view of the provisional Registration

부동산 권리 이전에서 가등기를 중심으로 등기청구권을 연구한다.

1 Registration of property titles which serves as public notice is a step to validate real estate transactions. It should be exercised by procedure act, the registraction act of real estate. In the article 28 of it, the registration should be done by the common application of one who has right to register and the other who ought to cooperate in registration, in this case, it is the claim to registration in the transfer of rights in immovables, which the former can claim to cooperate in registration against the latter. It is the obligatory claim to registration caused by the inter-partner transaction. 2.

Korean civil code has no provision concerning the provisional registration, which is equivalent to the German institution of "Vormenkung". It is wholly regulated in the Real property Registration Law, which is nothing but a procedural law.

Thus, Korean Real Property Registration Law includes, besides several procedural provisions, two substantial provisions as for the provisional registration, They provide as follows : Article 3-A provisional registration can be registered to preserve a right of claim pertaining to the establishment, thanslation, change, or lapse of the rights perscribed in the foregoing Article 6-② In case that a provisional registration is registered, the order of main registration shall be decided according to the order of the provisional registration. These two Articles are so defectively regulated that abundance of legal problems have been brought forward.

No doubt that this resulted from the deficient legislation. for example, in case that A holds a provisional registration on B's immovables, and then B transfers his ownership to C(third party), To whom A claims cooperation to hold the main registration on the basis of his provisional registration?

As a Conclusion, I think it is desirable that we amend our Real Property Registration Law as follows : The act between the immovables owner B and the third party C is invalidity to the provisional registration righter A, and when the provisional registration righter A asks Registration public office to make his provisional registration into a main registration, a registration officer must cancel the third party's registration on immovables in virtue of his office.

目次 第一章 問題의 提起 = 1 第1節 硏究의 目的 = 1 第二章 登記請求權의 發生原因과 性質 = 8 第1節 登記請求權의 意義 = 8 第2節 共同申請主義와 登記請求權 = 9 第3節 登記權利者와 登記義務者 = 13 第4節 登記請求權과 登記申請權 = 18 第5節 登記請求權의 發生原因 = 19 Ⅰ. 槪觀 = 19 Ⅱ. 法律行爲에 의한 物權變動의 경우 = 20 1) 學說의 槪觀 = 20 2) 學說의 紹介 = 21 3) 學說의 檢討 = 26 Ⅲ. 實體關係와 登記가 附合되지 않는 경우 = 32 Ⅳ. 取得時效로 인한 경우 = 35 Ⅴ. 其他의 경우 = 37 1) 不動産賃借權의 경우 = 37 2) 不動産還買權의 경우 = 38 第6節 登記請求權과 消滅時效 = 38 第三章 假登記를 할 수 있는 權利 및 請求權 = 42 第1節 假登記의 意義 = 42 第2節 假登記를 할 수 있는 權利 = 44 第3節 假登記를 할 수 있는 請求權 = 48 Ⅰ. 權利의 設定ㆍ移轉ㆍ變更 또는 消滅의 請求權 = 48 Ⅱ. 始期附 또는 停止條件附인 請求權 = 54 Ⅲ. 其他 將來에 있어서 確定할 請求權 = 55 第四章 所有權移轉請求權保全의 假登記 후 그 本登記전에 第3者에게 所有權移轉의 本登記가 있는 경우 = 56 第1節 問題의 所在 = 56 第2節 獨逸의 경우 = 58 第3節 日本의 경우 = 62 Ⅰ. 判例 = 62 Ⅱ. 學說 = 64 Ⅲ. 法律改正과 制度의 改善 = 66 第4節 우리나라의 判例 = 67 第5節 判例ㆍ學說의 檢討 = 69 第五章 所有權者側으로부터의 假登記名義人에 대한 登記請求權 = 82 第1節 問題의 所在 = 82 第2節 所有權讓渡人(甲