공공개발택지정책에 관한 연구: 안양 연현지구를 중심으로

안양 연현지구를 사례로 공공개발택지정책의 공공성과 정책효과를 분석했다.

Public housing development projects have the greatest goal of publicity, but the analysis of policy effects is an indispensable analysis for reducing the burden of housing costs for homeless households from low-income families, reinforcing housing stability, and revitalizing the local economy from the perspective of publicity. Moreover, the analysis of economic feasibility in public housing site development projects is indispensable for ‘completely sold projects’ and ‘public projects with a record of surpluses’. If this is neglected, it is an unsold project or a deficit project, which puts a huge burden on the local economy and residents.

Therefore, this study attempted to analyze the policy effect problem of the public housing site development project focusing on the target site promoted by Anyang City (Anyang Yeonhyeon Public Development Housing Site). The Anyang Yeonhyeon Public Development Housing District has a very large scale and expectation among the projects promoted by Anyang City, so we have reviewed various domestic and overseas precedent studies in detail, but until now, it has been difficult to find comparative data on the policy effects of public housing development.

The reason is that since policy analysis is a qualitative analysis, it is difficult to quantify the benefits in advance, and public projects with a relatively long term compared to the short term of the head of the group are spontaneously promoted according to the political direction, but the responsibility is clearly held. It is also because He&She(the head of the group) did not try to cover it.

As shown in this study, even if the economic feasibility analysis is somewhat negative, there are many cases of promoting the project if some are positive in terms of technology and finance, and the regional economic ripple effect is large in the policy analysis, and local financial soundness is eased. Although the Anyang Yeonhyeon public housing district development project is somewhat negative in the economic analysis, it is necessary to review positively if the policy effects such as welfare of residents, housing stability of the common people, balanced development of the region, and activation of the local economy are large.

In this case, as a result, He & She( the head of the group) will be able to escape the responsibility of promoting “unsold” or “deficit projects”.