公益事業을위한土地등의取得및 補償에관한法律上의 還買權 = A Study on the Redemptive Right of Land Compensation Act

공익사업을 위한 토지 취득·보상과 환매권을 연구했다.

A prerequisite to the fair compensation is acknowledged by Constitutions Article 23, (3) “Expropriation, use or restriction of private property for public necessity and compensation therefore shall be governed by statute: Provided, that in such a case, just compensation shall be paid.” that limitation for property rights.

Thus administratively compensation claim once ends if business practitioner expropriate property by fair compensating lawfully for public utility. But it can be appropriate, although after the claim ends if practitioner doesn’t have any use of expropriate property for public utility, that original property owner can recover one's proprietary rights even though practitioner acquired proprietary rights justifiably. This effort created the redemptive right Compensation amount cannot be reflected in personal marker price, even though Public-expropriation can make up for fair compensational conditions, and, also property owner cannot be satisfied for compensation amount if it is against property owner’s freewill. So, this redemptive right explains one system that balances the underlying boundary which of the legitimacy of property rights confinement for public necessities and property rights confinement needs to be minimized the personal profits violation. In our modern nations, there is a trend for increasing administration of public benefit and this explains why the modern notion is much more different than property rights confinement for citizens own interests.

On the other hand, this explains that there is more needs to analyze the balances between personal and public benefits in great details. the redemptive right is one system that protects personal interests which property owners can aggressively inquire for ownership repossession afterwards, it also prevents practitioners/governments from making more purchases on properties than the plans call for and not to acquire any properties without any specific executable plans. From the all the above explain the redemptive right is one very meaningful system for property rights assurance. Public utility is increased rapidly and became a very important subject in reality of this county nowadays.

Therefore in this research I want to study the actual definition of the redemptive right in Public-expropriation, observe actual system applicability and affiliated problems in more detail, and suggest current the redemptive right issues and alterative solutions constructively.

第1章 序論 1 第1節 硏究의 目的 1 第2節 硏究의 範圍와 方法 3 第2章 公法上 還買權의 法理 6 第1節 還買權의 槪念 6 第2節 類似槪念과의 區分 9 Ⅰ. 民法上의 還買 9 Ⅱ. 都市및住居環境整備法上의 優先買受請求權 10 Ⅲ. 宅地開發促進法上의 事業施行者의 還買 11 第3節 還買權의 認定根據 11 Ⅰ. 理論的 根據에 대한 見解 12 1. 感情의 尊重에서 구하는 見解 12 2. 公平의 견지에서 구하는 見解 13 3. 財産權의 存續保障 思想에서 구하는 見解 13 4. 政策的 配慮에서 구하는 見解 14 5. 結合說 14 6. 判例의 立場 15 7. 小結 16 Ⅱ. 實定法的 根據를 요하는지 與否 17 1. 不要說 18 2. 必要說 18 3. 大法院의 判例 19 4. 憲法裁判所의 決定例 20 4. 小結 22 제4절 還買權의 法的性質 23 Ⅰ. 公權 또는 私權인지의 與否 23 1. 公·私法의 區別論 24 2. 事業認定 후 取得土地의 還買權 26 3. 事業認定 전 協議取得한 土地의 還買權 29 4. 小結 30 Ⅱ. 形成權으로서의 還買權 31 제5절 公法上 還買權에 대한 各國의 立法例 32 Ⅰ. 序論 32 Ⅱ. 獨逸의 還買制度 33 Ⅲ. 프랑스의 還買制度 36 Ⅳ. 日本의 還買制度 38 第3障 公益事業을위한土地등의取得및補償에관한法律法上의 還買權 41 第1節 公用收用 法制와 還買權 沿革 41 Ⅰ. 公用收用의 制度 41 Ⅱ. 公用收用 一般法製의 變遷과 還買權 42 1. 土地補償法制의 二元化 42 2. 土地補償法의 制定과 還買制度의 一元化 44 3. 各 個別法律에 의한 公用收用과 還買權 45 제2절 還買權者와 相對方 46