연구 요약
연구 요지 (AI)
미등기 부동산 매수인의 법적 지위와 권리 취득 문제를 연구했다.
초록
The current civil code of the Republic of Korea(KCC) adopts so called for- malism instead of idealism in relation to the changes in property rights over real property(KCC § 186). Therefore real property transferee, who occupies and uses real property but doesn't register it, can not acquire ownership of the concerned real property. Nevertheless in reality of legal life there are many real property transferees because of aftereffect of idealism in relation to the changes in property rights over real property, legal notion of tradition, intention of speculations, and so on.
In relation to the real property transferee's legal position there are two theory, the theory of 'expectation right on real right, the theory of creditor(nominated by me) The former accents the necessity of protection of real property transferee, the latter our formalism, those who are transfered the real property must register it. The legal principles of exceptio rei venditae et traditae belong to the latter The former explains it very well in realtion to the reality of legal life but has the limits in realtion to the legislationism over real property(KCC § 185).
The latter has the limits of defying the reality of legal life and lacking in coherence of theory Therefore I introduce Supreme court's precedents; Nominal trust. The Nominal trest is the legal relations that in the external relations of the trustee holds only the name of the ownership of the trust property the trust property in the public register but that in the interal relations the trustor retains the ownership of the trust property substantially and administers or avails the property The main reasons are that Supreme court's precedents ackonoledge the Intermiditary - skipped - registration in the Nominal trust.
I examine closely real property transferes's legal position This thesis is constituted as follows Chafter Ⅰ, Introduction Chafter Ⅱ, The theory of expectation right on real right Chafter Ⅲ, The theory of creditor Chafter Ⅳ, The theroy Nominal trust Chafter Ⅴ, Conclusions
목차
목차 = ⅰ ABSTRACT = ⅲ 第Ⅰ章 序論 = 1 第1節 問題의 提起 = 1 第2節 硏究의 範圍와 方法 = 4 第Ⅱ章 物權的 期待權說 = 5 第1節 序說 = 5 第2節 獨逸에서의 登記前 Auflassungsempfa¨nger의 地位와 物權的 期待權 = 7 1. 理論的 基礎 = 7 2. 登記前 Auflassungsempa¨nger의 期待權의 法律的 性質 = 9 3. 獨逸判例의 態度 = 11 4. 物權的 期待權 理論構成의 實益 = 11 第3節 未登記不動産買受人의 物權的 期待權 = 13 1. 物權的 期待權理論 導入背景 = 13 2. 理論的 基礎 = 16 第4節 未登記不動産買受人의 法的地位 = 19 1. 目的 不動産의 占有 使用 受益權 = 19 2. 中間省略登記 = 21 3. 所有權移轉 登記 請求權의 法的性質 = 25 4. 物權的 期待權의 保護 = 28 第5節 地位糾明의 限界 = 29 第Ⅲ章 債權者說 = 31 第1節 序說 = 31 第2節 理論的 基礎 = 32 1. 未登記不動産買受人의 保護 必要性의 不存在 = 32 2. 物權的 合意의 拘束力의 不存在(所有權 取得의 不確實) = 33 3. 物權的 期待權의 公示의 不可能 = 34 4. 物權的 期待權 認定의 實益의 不存在 = 34 第3節 exceptio rei venditae et traditae 理論 = 34 1. 로마法上의 exceptio rei venditae et traditae의 槪念 = 35 2. 獨逸에서의 exceptio rei venditae et traditae = 36 3. 우리 民法에서의 exceptio lei venditae et traditae
발행 정보
1994. 조선대학교 대학원 국내석사 학위논문