연구 요약
연구 요지 (AI)
재건축과 리모델링 사업의 단계별 추진 요인을 비교·분석한다.
초록
As the apartment complexes supplied in the 1990s are aging, reconstruction and remodeling are becoming important alternatives to solve the problem of aging apartment complexes. However, both projects involve policy, institutional, economic, and social complexity, and conflicts between various stakeholders frequently occur during the project promotion process. This study aims to derive efficient promotion plans by comparing and analyzing the promotion factors of reconstruction and remodeling projects at each stage, and to propose customized policies that reflect differences in expert types and regions.
In particular, it presents policy implications by considering the regional characteristics of the metropolitan area and non-metropolitan area, and seeks directions to minimize conflicts between project participants. Based on literature and a survey, the study specified the main factors of reconstruction and remodeling projects into major categories (planning, resolution, construction and liquidation), medium categories (policy, architectural plan, association, economic feasibility, construction company, and partner company), and small categories.
The main promotion factors were derived by reviewing existing literature and brainstorming techniques, and the final variables were confirmed by reflecting expert opinions, and the importance of experts was assessed using the AHP technique. The survey was conducted by dividing experts into practical and administrative experts, and the survey responses were processed through statistical analysis using SPSS and AHP software I Make It, and a comparative analysis including regional divisions of the metropolitan area and non-metropolitan areas was conducted.
As a result of the analysis of factors promoting reconstruction and remodeling projects by stage, policy factors and economic feasibility were evaluated as important factors in the planning stage, the participation of the association and the consent rate of residents in the resolution stage, and the capacity of the construction company and coordination between partners in the construction and liquidation stages. In terms of differences by type of expert, practical experts placed relatively more importance on economic feasibility and construction-related factors, which was analyzed as a result of concerns about the actual feasibility and cost-effectiveness of the project.
On the other hand, administrative experts evaluated policy factors and resident participation as more important factors, which was analyzed as a result of strengthening the institutional validity and social acceptance of the project. In terms of regional differences, economic feasibility and policy support accounted for a high proportion in the metropolitan area, which was judged to be a result of the high housing demand and complex administrative requirements in the metropolitan area.
In non-metropolitan areas, the resettlement of residents and securing infrastructure were evaluated as more important tasks, which was judged to be the result of considering the population decline and poor infrastructure conditions in the region. In terms of the difference between the two projects, reconstruction was highly evaluated for its expectations of economic profitability and the importance of policy support for rapid implementation, while remodeling focused on improving the quality of existing housing at a relatively low cost. The common factor between the two projects was that resident consent and participation were important factors.
In terms of policy, the analysis of factors promoting reconstruction and remodeling projects suggested policy directions that can optimize the promotion method of the government and local governments. Customized support measures that reflect the differences between metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas are needed, and policies that can strengthen resident participation along with economic incentives are important. In terms of practice, as a result of reflecting the opinions of practical experts, education and support are needed to strengthen the capabilities of construction companies and partner companies to increase the feasibility of the project.
In addition, the establishment of a communication platform and a cooperative decision-making model can be suggested to minimize conflicts among stakeholders participating in the project. Socially, support policies for the stability of resident resettlement and improvement of housing welfare should be strengthened, and financial and institutional measures are needed to reduce the burden on indigenous people. This can improve the social acceptability of the old apartment complex maintenance project.
It is expected that the main driving factors of the reconstruction and remodeling projects will be systematically analyzed to contribute to improving the efficiency of the old apartment complex maintenance project. This study compared the driving factors of the reconstruction and remodeling projects by stage to derive the differences and commonalities between the two projects and suggested policy, social, and practical implications. It is expected that this will contribute to the efficient promotion of the project and stable housing supply, and alleviate the conflicts of the old apartment complex maintenance project. 1990년대에 공급된 공동주택이 노후화되면서 노후 공동주택 문제를 해결하기 위해 재건축과 리모델링은 중요한 대안으로 자리 잡고 있다.
그러나 두 사업은 정책적, 제도적, 경제적, 사회적 복잡성을 포함하고 있으며, 사업 추진 과정에서 다양한 이해관계자 간의 추진 갈등이 빈번히 발생한다. 본 연구는 재건축과 리모델링 사업의 단계별 추진 요인을 비교 분석하여 효율적인 추진 방안을 도출하고, 전문가 유형 및 지역별 차이를 반영한 맞춤형 정책을 제안하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 특히 수도권과 비수도권의 지역적 특성을 고려하여 정책적 시사점을 제시하고, 사업 참여 주체 간의 갈등을 최소화할 수 있는 방향성을 모색하였다. 연구는 문헌과 설문조사를 바탕으로, 재건축 및 리모델링 사업의 주요 요인을 대분류(계획, 결의, 건설 및 청산), 중분류(정책, 건축 계획, 조합, 경제성, 시공업체, 협력업체), 소분류로 구체화하였다. 주요 추진요인은 기존 문헌 검토와 브레인스토밍 기법을 통해 항목 변수를 도출하고, 전문가 의견을 반영하여 최종 변수들을 확정하여, AHP기법을 활용하여 전문가들의 중요도 평가를 진행하였다. 설문은 전문가를 실무와 행정전문가로 구분하여 실시하였고, 설문 응답은 SPSS를 활용한 통계 분석과 AHP 소프트웨어인 I Make It을 통해 처리되었으며, 수도권과 비수도권의 지역적
발행 정보
2024. 목원대학교 대학원 국내박사 학위논문