도시재생사업의 법적 한계에 관한 연구

도시재생사업에서 재산권 제한의 법적 근거와 한계를 연구했다.

The law on urban regeneration inevitably limits the property rights of the people guaranteed by the Constitution.

However, according to the constitutional request that the urban regeneration law can be restricted by law in restricting the basic rights of the people, the principle of the rule of law and the principle of legal reservation are applied.Therefore, in order to establish urban regeneration projects, there must be a basis for laws and regulations, and the urban regeneration projects need a legal basis because the effect directly affects the rights and obligations of the people and has legal binding power for related administrative agencies. The following are the directions for the restoration of local communities and the improvement of specific legislation for urban competitiveness.

First, the social and economic urban regeneration should be focused on improving the physical environment and allowing residents to develop their capabilities and create jobs and income. Second, the government should continue to commercialize citizen's ideas and provide budget to the places that citizens need to improve their satisfaction. Third, the city should be rebuilt economically, socially and physically by introducing new functions to existing cities with the goal. Fourth, the process of project progress and monitoring improvement are needed. Fifth, the status and authority of the promotion team and the council should be strengthened and practical operation plans should be sought.

Sixth, it is necessary to revitalize local economy, improve residential environment, create space for win-win city centered on residents, and create new urban regeneration brand value. Seventh, it is necessary to build a village that lives well together through support for start-up by breaking away from the negative image of urban regeneration. Eighth, long-term and cheap rental support should be provided so that artists and renters do not leave for gentrification.

Ninth, the administration should establish a collaborative system in which one department can carry out the business in general, and respond to the improvement of housing welfare and quality of life of the urban regeneration New Deal effect, job creation and urban competitiveness, social integration and sustainability, and real estate market impact. Finally, it is necessary to promote urban regeneration as a people-centered cultural space that does not destroy the role of existing city as a cultural and economic residence so that indigenous people do not lose their living place and leave for the outside world, but preserves the city's original form and revitalizes the city's function.

제1장 서 론 1 제1절 연구의 목적 1 제2절 연구의 범위와 방법 2 제2장 도시재생사업의 이론적 고찰 3 제1절 도시재생사업의 기초이론 3 1. 도시재생과 도시재생사업 3 2. 도시재생사업과 도시정비사업 11 제2절 외국의 도시재생사업과 관련법제 15 1. 개 관 15 2. 영국의 도시재생사업과 관련법제 17 3. 일본의 도시재생사업과 관련법제 21 제3절 우리나라의 도시재생사업과 관련법제 25 1. 우리나라의 도시재생사업 25 2. 우리나라의 도시재생사업 관련법제 28 3. 현행법상 도시재생사업의 구조체계 및 유형 32 제3장 도시재생사업과 사유재산제도 35 제1절 도시재생사업과 사유재산제도의 관계 35 1. 도시재생사업에서의 공공성 35 2. 도시재생사업과 사유재산권 보장 37 제2절 도시재생사업과 사유재산권 제한 42 1. 사유재산권 행사의 법적 한계 42 2. 토지공개념과의 관계 44 3. 사유재산권 행사의 사회적 구속성(기속성) 46 제4장 도시재생사업의 공법적 한계와 입법과제 49 제1절 도시재생사업의 문제점과 개선방안 49 1. 도시재생사업의 공법적 한계 문제 49 2. 도시재생사업으로 인한 사유재산권 제한의 문제 50 제2절 도시재생사업의 공법적 한계와 입법과제 52 1. 도시재생사업의 개선방안 52 2. 도시재생사업 관련법제의 정비방향 57 제5장 결 론 61 <참고문헌> 63