도시개발사업 토지소유자의 환지만족도에 관한 연구 : 김해시 내덕지구를 중심으로

도시개발사업에서 토지소유자의 환지 만족도에 영향을 주는 요인을 연구했다.

About 64% of the country's land area is mountainous and the actual land available for real life is only 36% of the land area in Korea. In Korea, there was the birth of a baby boom generation whose explosive population increased after 6.25 korean war, and when the birth of the baby boomers grew into a producible population at that time, the economy grew dramatically with the government-led industrialization economic development plan. The success of industrialization has increased the people 's income and the awareness of housing has gradually changed in proportion to the increased income. As the economy grew, the lack of land for economic growth had become a serious social problem.

In order to solve the shortage of land, the urban development project is being carried out in the Kimhae City Urban Development Project Nduk District, and the researcher acquires the land in the business district before or after the project is conducted in the district, From September 20, 2018, we have started to study the satisfaction of the landowners who received the land. This study was a good opportunity to glean the experiences and opinions of the business owners of Gimhae - dong Deokdong district. The urban development project currently being implemented by the private sector is summarized as follows.

First, the occupants of Daedeok district urban development project occupy more than 50 families by age and occupied the self - employed by occupation. The amount of assets is less than 1 billion, accounting for more than half of all landowners, annual income is between 2,000 ~ 80 million won, 70% of respondents, and knowledge about urban development projects is "normal" and "lack" %, Respectively. Secondly, the ratio of landowners who have already made their objections before the project is 38.6% versus 61.4%.

Those who opposed the project before the start of the development project were most likely to be "discontinued during the development project", followed by "lack of understanding about the project". 65% of the 194 people in favor of the project before the start of the project approved the project mainly for "the value of the development as a result of the development".

Third, the reason for purchasing the land in the Neduk area in the empirical analysis of the overall satisfaction of the overall business after the designation was determined was "investment", which accounted for more than 80% of the total survey respondents, and "farming" For the purposes of this study, the percentage of purchasing land (agricultural land prior to development) was 0%. At the time of purchasing the land, Gimhae had the most residence, followed by Busan and Changwon. About 60% of respondents said that they would "sell off" the future use of Hangzhou, and the next response was that they would "build" on their own.

The percentage of respondents who answered "dissatisfied" and "average" for the work of unions and contractors exceeded 80% of the respondents. As for the current tax system, "very dissatisfied" and "dissatisfied" exceeded 70% of the total response due to the development benefits (such as the reduction of capital income tax rate). Fourth, respondents who selected "Normal" were the most satisfied respondents in terms of location, direction, size, coverage ratio, volume ratio, usage area, and harmony with neighboring areas. However, the percentage of "very dissatisfied" and "dissatisfied" was about 70% in the response to the questionnaire.

It seems that the landowners are strongly opposed to the survey because they think that the size of the returned land is small even though they have already paid a lot of land for infrastructure and cevicage. Fifth, the overall process and process of the project, the support of the local government (such as the implementation of the expansion of the road at the time of the development project), the size of the infrastructure site (school, park road, etc.) The degree of satisfaction with the questionnaire about the expected return on investment, etc., was higher than that of "normal" or "dissatisfied".

In addition, the negative responses of "very dissatisfied" and "dissatisfied" were very clear in the question about the limit of the number of households (maximum 4 households allowed) in the residential area for one day and the construction of the apartment for rent in the residential area. The empirical analysis of this study suggests that the opinions of the owner of the firm can be changed at any time and for any reason. It is a fact revealed in the survey, but the owner of the project was most worried that the development project was stuck and the construction was stopped during the project.

It is also necessary to revise and supplement the tax system and local government support policies related to urban development projects. As revealed by the survey results, the landowner has shown considerable dissatisfaction with the current tax and municipal support. The reason for this is that the development project has already given us a lot of land due to the burden of the infrastructure and the cevicage, but if we try to sell the remaining land after leaving a little profit at the completion of the construction, There was no other way. It is necessary to readjust the guidelines for the land-use rate.

According to the results of the survey, the degree of complaints about the rate of deterrence was very worrisome, especially in the details of satisfaction of the lotus owner. Therefore, it is necessary to readjust the rate of gauging that can be understood and understood by the owner of the lot within the current legal framework. It is necessary to alleviate the burden on the infrastructure land to be borne by the landowner. In order to realize the original purpose of the Urban Development Project, it is necessary to prepare a bill that relaxes the burden of the current infrastructure site given to the owner of the land and obligates the relevant municipalities to cover all or part of