일조권침해에 대한 민사법적 구제방안에 관한 연구 = Judicial relief for the infringement of the right to enjoy sunshine

도시 건축물의 일조권 침해에 대한 민사상 구제방안을 연구했다.

Human beings can not but take an inborn interest in the environment as the demands for a comfortable life in order to have a normal daily life. But with the phenomenon of high industrialization and urbanization the population towards cities and the phenomenon of high-rise and dense buildings have continued to cause the sunshine interruption problem to the human comfortable daily life. Especially, in case the great population is densely livings in the narrow national land like Korea, the problem of the infringement of the right to enjoy sunshine can not but appear remarkable with the construction of high-rise buildings arising from efficient land use. First of all, chapter Ⅰshows purpose and scope of study on the right to enjoy sunshine.

And it shows a meaningful discussion in season and related issues about the right to enjoy sunshine. Chapter Ⅱ explains the definition of the right to enjoy sunshine.

Also this chapter explains legislation of the right to enjoy sunshine in Rome, Germany, Swiss, England, United States and Japan. Chapter Ⅲ explains in our country, on civil law, the problem about the infringement of the right to sunshine can be settled through the proper management that is provied on Article 217 of civil law. A majority theory and a leading case thereabout in our country maintain that the infringing action of right of sunshine can be banned on the basis of reality demand right at the article 214, the civile code.

Also some argue that retention demand right can be exercised on the basis of environment right, personality right or tort, which can be possible as a legislation theory, but not be adopted as it trespasses the range of interpretation theory. Chapter Ⅳ explains the limit of the law-and-economics approach. Chapter Ⅴ aims to examine the civil law remedy for the damages related to the infringement of the right to enjoy sunshine.

Also when the infringement cases are not in the range of public law remedy, it is more appropriate to depend on the claim for interference rejection or the claim for interference prevention than the claim for damages as a legal remedy for the infringement to the right to enjoy sunshine. Finally, Chapter Ⅵ, in accordance with the changing society and in consideration of the characteristics of urban areas, it is necessary to revise public laws in order to reduce risk of disputes arising from the infringement of the right to enjoy sunshine. Also, it is necessary to strengthen the function of grievance mediation system under the building code.

제1장 서론 = 1 제1절 연구의 목적 = 1 제2절 연구의 방법과 범위 = 3 제2장 일조권에 관한 기본법리 = 4 제1절 일조권의 의의 = 4 제2절 민사상 일조권과 행정법상 일조권 = 5 제3절 일조의 이익 = 6 Ⅰ. 일조와 주거환경의 보호 = 6 Ⅱ. 일조의 효과 = 7 1. 직사일광에 의한 직접적 효과 = 7 가. 열효과 = 7 나. 광효과 = 8 다. 생리적, 화학적 효과 = 8 2. 일조의 간접적 효과 = 8 Ⅲ. 일조방해와 건강 = 9 제4절 일조침해의 특성 = 10 Ⅰ. 소극적 생활방해 = 10 Ⅱ. 일조방해건물도 소유권의 권능 = 11 Ⅲ. 상린관계적 분쟁 = 11 제5절 일조권 침해에 따른 비교법적 고찰 = 12 Ⅰ. 로마 = 12 Ⅱ. 독일 = 13 Ⅲ. 스위스 = 14 Ⅳ. 영미법 = 14 1. 영국 = 14 2. 미국 = 15 가. 전개과정 = 15 나. Wisconsin 주대법원의 Prah v. Maretti 사건 = 16 Ⅴ. 일본 = 18 1. 전개과정 = 18 2. 공사중지 · 철거청구의 경우 = 19 3. 손해배상청구의 경우 = 20 제3장 일조권의 법적 성격 = 22 제1절 서설 = 22 제2절 학설 = 23 Ⅰ. 물권적 청구권설 = 23 Ⅱ. 환경권설 = 25 Ⅲ. 불법행위설 = 26 Ⅳ. 일조권설 = 27 Ⅴ. 인격권설 = 28 Ⅵ. 생활이익향유권설 = 28 제3절 판례 = 29 Ⅰ. 환경권의 구체적인 권리성 부정 = 30 Ⅱ. 물권설이나 생활이익향수권설에 입각한 판례 = 31 제4절 검토 = 32 제4장 일조권침해 여부의 인정 = 34 제1절 일조방해의 측정 = 34