집합건물 대지사용권의 분리처분에 관한 제도개선 연구 = A study on separate disposition of the right to use site of aggregate buildings

집합건물 대지사용권의 분리처분에 관한 제도 개선을 연구했다.

The structure and forms of buildings have varied according to social changes and demand, and the forms of ownership to buildings have taken in different formats. An aggregate building is also one of the essential types of buildings in the present time. In order to own aggregate buildings in a reasonable manner, the Aggregate Building Act was enacted.

In this regard, it is necessary to maintain legal and institutional improvements with an aim to achieve reasonable holding and management of aggregate buildings. The court suggested a progressive guideline on the date of establishing the right of land use in case precedents for the purpose of preventing the separation and disposal of exclusive ownership and land use rights.

However, a number of experts underscored the need to implement additional stronger institutional improvements due to possible controversial aspects arising from partial criteria. This study examined legal and institutional improvements and alternative solutions for the role and duties of executing court with a goal of restraining the separation and disposal of land use right and alleviate the risk of the interested parties by conducting FGI by experts specializing in land use rights of aggregate buildings. Firstly, legal and institutional improvements adequate to the current situation are required.

The lack of legal institutions is a key cause of controversy over the establishment of land use right. In regard to case precedents, previous researchers have commonly noted the need to set up objective public notice by which the third parties can see. Legal institutions not on a par with the current situation are entirely responsible for disputes and unexpected risks arising from ambiguous legal institutions despite current demand for the prevention of separation and disposal. Second, institutional improvements in the disposal procedure by executing courts at the top of preservation disposal are required.

Land use right of aggregate buildings is a reasonable and effective way to own land and buildings in order to ban the risk of separating land with buildings. Possible exclusively owned parts and land use right must be comprehensively disposed by adopting legal and institutional disposal improvements. Third, it is necessary to make improvements to the role of court in charge of preservation and disposal. Most issues on the separation and disposal of aggregate buildings start at the step of preservation and disposal. When it comes to preservation and disposal, preservation registration is carried out in the name of those who have the right to approve building.

The establishment of land use right appears confusing as there are many cases in which ownerships prescribed in certified copies of registers are invalid due to preservation disposal on the ground of original acquisitors under the civil law. In this sense, the court must examine if land use right is legally valid at the step of preservation disposal. Difficulties related to legal and institutional systems designed to curb separation and disposal lie in the fact that separation and disposal must be restrained while the rights of interested parties of land and buildings are not directed toward a certain position.

Protecting the rights of land and building creditors is essential while ensuring the protection of land and building owners and buyers. As a limitation, granting approval of separation and disposal or encouraging a comprehensive disposal of exclusively owned parts is likely to bring about a conflict between the interested parties regarding the right of property and acquiring bonds. Institutional improvements are needed to restrain the separation and disposal of land use right and reduce the risk and loss of the interested parties by providing focused counsels by experts specializing in land use right and seasoned lawyers who have abundant real experiences.

제1장 서론 1 제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적 1 제2절 연구의 방법 및 범위 5 제2장 이론적 고찰 9 제1절 건물과 대지 9 1. 비집합건물의 대지 9 2. 집합건물의 개념 및 성립 11 제2절 대지사용권과 분리처분 16 1. 대지사용권의 개념 16 2. 대지사용권의 성립요건 17 3. 대지사용권의 분리처분 18 4. 전유부분과 대지사용권의 일체성 20 제3절 선행연구 검토 23 1. 대지사용권의 법제도에 대한 연구 23 2. 분리처분 문제에 대한 대안과 제도개선 연구 27 3. 선행연구와의 차별성 30 제3장 사례 및 판례분석 33 제1절 분리처분의 유형 및 사례 33 1. 집합건물 토지만의 매각과 전유부분의 대지사용권 33 2. 집합건물 전유부분의 매각과 대지사용권 39 제2절 판례분석 44 1. 대지사용권을 인정한 판례 44 2. 대지사용권을 인정하지 않은 판례 52 3. 소결 55 제3절 분리처분에 관한 논란의 쟁점 57 1. 대지사용권의 성립시점의 객관성 57 2. 상가건물의 구분소유권 58 3. 신축건물과 기존건물의 구분소유권 성립의 차이 59 4. 집행법원의 대지사용권 포함 여부의 불명확성 60 5. 미준공 집합건물에 대한 보전처분 시 대위등기 60 제4장 분리처분의 문제점 및 FGI분석 62 제1절 분리처분의 결과와 위험 62 1. 대지사용권을 취득하지 못한 전유부분의 위험 62 2. 전유부분만의 매각과 대지지분 소유권의 취득 63 3. 집합건물의 대지만의 매각 65 제2절 FGI 분석 66 1. FGI 분석방법 66 2. FGI 구성 및 배경 67 3. FGI 검토 68 제3절 개선안 77