賃貸借契約의 當事者變更

임대차계약에서 당사자 지위가 변경되는 법률관계를 연구했다.

1. The legal character of an assignment of lease is, in essence, an assignment of a contract. When an assignment of lease is viewed as a type of an assignment of a contract, the legal relationship regarding the assignment of a lessee's position can be understood as follows. The assignment of lease is not only possible through a mutual agreement among three parties involved, but also through an agreement between a lessee and an assignee with a consent of a lessor. In this case, the consent of the lessor will be the condition for effectuation under the nature of an assignment of a contract.

The position of a lessee will be generally transferred to the assignee by this assignment of lease, along with other subordinate contracts and obligations, and in case a lease with an absolute title[대항력] is assigned, this title may be transferred as well. 2. In the case of an assignment without a consent, the assignment of lease will be denied of any effect under the nature of an assignment of a contract. Under a special condition where the assignment of lease is not a result of a breach of trust by the lessee, the assignment of lease may be admitted without a consent of the lessor.

The "special condition" in this case may include, among others, personal trust and economical interest as its more detailed criteria. Furthermore, an assignment of lease may be admitted in exceptional cases, pending an evaluation of a possible abuse of power by a lessor in refusing to give consent and terminating a contract.

When there exists a special condition where an action does not account as a breach of trust to the lessor, the legal character of an assignment of lease shall be viewed as an assignment of a contract, since the condition of consent by the lessor (or a consent by a third person) need not be interpreted strictly and in some cases it is possible for an assignment of a contract to be admitted without a consent. 3. In case the object of the lease is transferred, the lessee may not, in principle, argue the real right of the new owner.

However, as an exception, the Civil Law prescribes absolute title[대항력] in Articles 621 and 622 of the Civil Law Act and in Article 3 of the Housing Rental Protection Act. Especially in Article 3 Paragraph 2 of the Housing Rental Protection Act, the law allows the assignment of a lessee's position after a final and definite transfer of the object of the lease has taken place. Following the interpretation of this provision, since the assignee must have a final and definite transfer of the object and its position is generally assigned under this article, the assignee is an assignee of a contract in a statutory assignment of a contract.

Meanwhile, in the viewpoint of the lessee, under the Housing Rental Protection Act, the lessee holds the absolute title and also the priority in repayment, which may both be exercised at the same time. The priority in repayment does not expire after its first use, but may be exercised in future auctions as well. 4. The lessee may stop the transfer of the lessor's position by making an objection. Before the lessee makes an objection, a certain period of time is required in order to test the assignee's financial resources.

The lessor's position is assigned at the time of the assignment by Article 3 Paragraph 2 of the Housing Rental Protection Act, but the position is retroactively annulled when an objection is made, rendering the assignee's lessor position resolutively conditional upon the objection.

目次 = 5 [Abstract] = 10 제1장 序論 = 12 Ⅰ. 연구의 목적 = 12 Ⅱ. 연구의 방향과 범위 = 14 제2장 임차인의 변경 = 17 제1절 임차인의 변경에 대한 입법례 = 17 Ⅰ. 각국의 입법례 = 17 1. 독일 = 17 2. 프랑스 = 19 3. 일본 = 21 4. 영국 = 22 Ⅱ. 현행법의 태도 = 26 제2절 임차권 양도의 의의와 법적 성질 = 27 Ⅰ. 임차권양도의 의의 = 27 1. 임차권양도의 개념 및 기능 = 27 2. 임차권양도와의 구분개념 = 28 Ⅱ. 임차권양도의 법적성질에 관한 학설의 대립 = 29 1. 지명채권 양도설 = 30 2. 계약인수설 = 31 3. 評價 = 31 제3절 지명채권양도 구성에 따른 임차권양도의 법률관계 = 32 Ⅰ. 지명채권양도에 따른 법적구성 = 32 1. 임대인의 동의가 없는 경우 = 32 2. 임차권양도의 금지특약이 있는 경우 = 33 Ⅱ. 지명채권양도의 구성에 따른 임대인 동의의 해석 = 35 1. 임차권양도합의의 態樣 = 35 2. 임대인 동의의 필요성 = 37 3. 임대인 동의의 효력 = 38 Ⅲ. 지명채권양도의 구성에 따른 임차권양도의 효력 = 39 1. 임차권의 승계적 이전 = 39 2. 임차권의 종된 권리의 이전 = 39 Ⅳ. 지명채권양도의 구성에 대한 평가 = 41 제4절 계약인수에 의한 임차인 지위양도의 법적구성 = 41 Ⅰ. 계약인수의 구성에 따른 법적 다툼 = 41 1. 견해의 대립 = 41 2. 評價 = 43 Ⅱ. 임차인지위 양도의 요건 = 45 1. 임차인과 양수인간 양도의 합의 = 45 2. 임대인의 동의 = 4