名義信託에 관한 硏究 : 大法院判例를 中心으로

부동산 명의신탁에 관한 대법원 판례와 법리를 연구했다.

This article is a systematic study on the “Myong-Eui trust.” The Korean Suprem Court has established through it’s decisions “Myong-Eui trust” which may be transtated into English as “name trust”. It’s decisions o the “Myong-Eui trust” is one of judge-made laws.

According to the Supreme Court decisions, the “Myong-Eui trust” or “name trust” is such a trust that, though a trustor transfer his immovable to a trustee and the trustee be registered as on owner in the public register, in the internal relations between the parties the trustor retains the ownership of the entrusted immovable and maintains or avails the property, but in the external relations against the third party the transfer of the entrusted immovable from the trustor to the trustee shall be regarded as perfect.

I would like briefly describe the body of this study as follows; Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 I studied the meaning of “trust” that has been extraordinary developed in English law and the theory of “Treu-handgeschaft” or “fiduziarisches Rechtsgeschaft” that has been developed in Germany by The Pandecten scholars, and the influences of these two institutions on the Korean legal system and practies. Moreover I investigated the history of “Myong-Eui trust” and the concept of the “Myong-Eui trust.” Chapter 3 I investigated examples of the “Myong-Eui trust” such as the “Myong-Eui trust” of the property of the Chong jung etc.

Chapter 4 Establishment of the “Myong-Eui trust” Chapter 5 I discussed the va1adity of the court thory as to the “Myong-Eui trust” Chapter 6 I inquired into the legal relations of the “Myong- Eui trust” established by the Supreme Court decisions in detail; Section 1 The internal relations between the parties Section 2 The external relations against the third party Section 3 The dissolution of the “Myong-Eui trust” Chapter 7 I dealt with the concerning problem of the “Myong- Eui trust” such as taxes and the criminal responsibility Chapter 8 Conclusion In Conclusion in this article, though in many cases the “Myong-Eui trust” has been abused to conceal one’s property or to eva1e paying taxes, I assert that the “Myong-Eui trust” has a value and use in our legal praetices.

第一章 序說 = 1 第1節 硏究의 目的 = 1 第2節 硏究의 方法 및 範圍 = 2 第二章 序論的 考察 = 4 第1節 머리에 = 4 第2節 信託法上의 信託 = 5 第3節 民法學上의 信託行爲 = 12 第4節 名義信託의 沿革 = 22 第5節 名義信託의 意義 = 30 第三章 名義信託의 事例 = 36 第1節 宗中財産의 名義信託 = 36 第2節 一筆地의 土地中 一部를 員受하고 一筆地 全部에 대하여 所有灌移轉登記를 한 경우 = 39 第3節 相互名義信託 = 40 第4節 歸屬財産의 拂下 및 買受와 名義信託 = 43 第5節 農地와 名義信託 = 44 第5節 自動車登錄名義의 信託 = 46 第7節 競賣에 있어서의 信託入札 = 41 第8節 加入電話使用權의 名義信託 = 48 第9節 기타 = 50 第四章 名義信託의 成立 = 52 第1節 名義信託設定契約 = 52 第2節 公簿上 信託者名義로 登記·登錄된 事實이 없는 信託目的物의 名義信託成立與否 = 56 第五章 名義信託의 有效性論 = 59 第1節 名義信託과 虛僞表示 = 59 第2節 名義信託과 脫法行爲 = 66 第六章 名義信託의 法律關係 = 68 第1節 對內的 關係 = 68 1. 信託者의 地位 = 68 2. 受託者의 地位 = 70 3. 信託者와 受託者의 關係 = 72 第2節 對外的 關係 = 76 1. 第三者에 대한 所有權行使 = 76 2. 信託者의 信託財産處分과 受託者와의 關係 = 82 3. 受託者의 信託財産處分과 信託者와의 關係 = 86 4. 名義信託과 强制執行·破産(一般債權者와의 關係) = 96 第3節 名義信託關係의 解消 = 99 1. 名義信託關係의 解消의 方法 및 解止權者 = 99 2. 名