재개발사업 추진단계별 추가분담금 발생요인에 관한 연구

재개발사업 단계별 추가분담금 발생요인을 분석했다.

Due to the lack of housing supply due to the recent concentration of population in the metropolitan area, the housing cost burden is increasing due to the rise in house prices and the rise in jeonse and monthly rental prices. In the 1970s, the redevelopment project went through self-reliance, local improvement and redevelopment, and consignment redevelopment in the implementation method. .

The Urban Redevelopment Act was enacted and implemented in 1976 as a housing improvement and redevelopment project and an urban redevelopment project to achieve the policy goal of large-scale housing supply expansion in accordance with the concentration of local population in large cities due to rapid industrialization. In 1983, a joint redevelopment method similar to the current redevelopment project was introduced, revitalizing the redevelopment project, which had been slow to progress, and increasing the development floor area ratio to induce the mass supply of housing led by the private sector. promoted.

This was the best way to secure the infrastructure of a residential area that was outdated and poor, and to improve and change the residential environment, considering the limited public resources at the time. This large-scale maintenance method alleviated the housing shortage problem, which was serious at the time, and improved the poor housing environment. In the joint redevelopment method, the cooperative established by the residents becomes the developer, designates the contractor, and the private sector is promoting and leading the redevelopment project. to be.

In this method, the cooperative constituted as owners of land, etc., becomes the implementer of the project, and the construction company builds a house by lending the project cost, builds a surplus in addition to the sale of the union members, and sells it as a general sale. have. However, as a result of relying on private capital to promote the project, the focus was on business feasibility rather than public nature. There were problems such as lack of roles and low resettlement rate of indigenous peoples.

Accordingly, in October 2002, a special law for the promotion of urban renewal called the “New Town Project” was introduced in Seoul (hereinafter referred to as the Recruitment Act) for planned and systematic urban renewal. Then, in December 2002, the Urban and Residential Environment Improvement Act (hereafter the Provincial Government Act) was enacted and implemented in July 2003 for the efficient promotion of the rearrangement projects that had been carried out under each individual law.

During this period, the redevelopment project was focused on quantitative development to generate development profits by supplying a large amount of housing due to its high business performance and profitability. At the time of the establishment of the basic maintenance plan, the real estate market was booming, and the enactment of the Provincial Government Act was to ignite the fuse of maintenance projects including redevelopment projects.

Since the planned district was introduced to the redevelopment project that provided wealth and changed the urban environment without direct intervention from the public's point of view, residents were competitively requesting district designation at this time. , there was no reason for the public to reject it. However, due to the Lehman Incident in 2008, the global economic recession and subsequent real estate and construction markets slumped rapidly, and all maintenance projects including redevelopment projects also fell into a long-term recession.

Project promotion has been delayed or stopped in most areas of the country, except for some of the metropolitan areas with good business potential. As a result, construction companies were avoiding local redevelopment projects, and they concentrated on projects in the metropolitan area with good sales performance. Unlike when the maintenance project was booming, various problems arose, such as intensifying conflicts among residents, disagreeing for and against whether to proceed with the project, deepening conflicts between the construction company and residents, deterioration of the residential environment, and infringement of residents’ property rights.

In order to compensate for the problems of the large-scale demolition method and the sluggish projects, on August 2, 2012, with the revision of the Provincial Government Act, the street house maintenance project and the residential environment management project were additionally introduced to the maintenance project, the district designation was canceled, and the public role was strengthened.

was added The manufacturing industry, which plays an important role in the economy, is shrinking, and there are many cases in which the redevelopment project being promoted is delayed or the business entity is suspended due to social problems such as the sales market recession, low growth, slow construction economy, low birth rate and aging population. . The redevelopment project should place priority on the consensus and cooperation of the residents above all else.

This is because, through transparent business promotion and frequent communication, business understanding is improved and the participation rate of union members is increased, which becomes a driving force for rapid business promotion.

However, since the private capital input and project execution body is a union made up of local residents, the project agent's unprofessionalism, lack of communication, and unilateral project promotion lacking resident participation, opaque business handling, construction company request for additional construction cost, administrative agency Conflicts have continued due to conflicts of interest among project stakeholders due to excessive demand for infrastructure installation, frequent policy changes and various regulations by the government and administrative agencies, etc. The maintenance project is divided into a housing rede