名義信託과 不當利得返還請求에 관한 硏究 = (A) study on the real name registration system and the restitution of unjust enrichment

부동산 명의신탁의 실명등기제도와 부당이득 반환청구를 연구했다.

The Real Name Registration System is defined as transferring ownerships of real properties in the name of others. Apparently, this system seems to change ownership of real properties, but does not change the right of real property. In other word, while the ownership of real properties is transferred to trustees, trusters keep ownership of real properties and manage real properties. Because of complexity of ownership in The Real Name Registration System, it is better to show relationship of ownerships in forms of registration. Therefore, this system encompasses trees, ships, airplanes, cars, heavy machines, etc. which are registered by laws of real property, buildings, and trees.

This system is unique and only found in South Korea. The Real Name Registration System stems from a practice of registration in the name of one or several persons under Chosun Dynasty. This system was highly criticized for using it for the purpose of tax evasion and concealment of real properties. Although governmental agencies have passed laws to enhance this system, it was proven unsuccessful. However, the Real Property-Real Name Registration Act strengthens this system by defining transactions of real property with real name registration system as invalid and by applying severe penalties to law breakers.

This paper shows changes in theory of judicial cases about the Real Name Registration System since the Real Property-Real Name Registration Act was passed. Referring new interpretation of the Real Name Registration System based on the Real Property-Real Name Registration Act, this paper points problems of this Act and suggests further steps for improving this law.

Also, this paper compares judicial cases showing that claims the restitution of trusted properties in the case of when trustee registration does not good hold any more before the Real Property-Real Name Registration Act and judicial cases showing that price paid to trustees should belong to a restitution list and should be restituted.

目次 = ⅰ 제1장 序論 = 1 제1절 硏究의 目的 = 1 제2절 硏究의 方法과 範圍 = 1 제2장 名義信託의 意義와 本質 = 3 제1절 意義 = 3 Ⅰ. 名義信託의 槪念 = 3 Ⅱ. 名義信託의 範圍 = 4 Ⅲ. 名義信託의 實定法上 槪念 = 4 제2절 名義信託의 本質 = 5 Ⅰ. 序說 = 5 Ⅱ. 名義信託의 本質 = 6 제3장 名義信託에 대한 發展過程과 蓮營現況 = 9 제1절 名義信託의 法律關係 = 9 Ⅰ. 名義信託의 法理 構成 = 9 1. 學說 = 9 2. 檢討 = 11 Ⅱ. 對內的 法律關係 = 13 Ⅲ. 對外的 法律關係 = 14 Ⅳ. 名義信託의 解止 = 14 1. 受託者에 대한 關係 = 15 2. 第3者에 대한 關係 = 15 제2절 名義信託의 弊害와 規制方法 = 15 Ⅰ. 名義信託의 弊害 = 16 1. 脫稅手段 = 16 2. 脫法手段 = 17 3. 財産隱匿手段 = 18 4. 不動産投機手段 = 18 5. 其他 = 18 Ⅱ. 名義信託에 대한 特別法上 規制 = 19 1. 相續稅法 第32條의 2에 의한 規制 = 19 2. 不動産登記特別措置法 第7條에 의한 規制 = 19 3. 個別法律에 의한 間接規定 = 20 4. 名義信託 規制의 限界 = 22 제3절 不動産實名法의 內容 = 22 Ⅰ. 不動産實名法의 目的 = 22 Ⅱ. 名義信託約定의 定議와 範圍 = 23 1. 名義信託約定의 定議 = 23 2. 名義信託約定의 範圍 = 23 Ⅲ. 實權利者 名義登記義務(名義信託의 禁止條項) = 25 Ⅳ. 名義信託 約定 및 登記의 效力 = 26 1. 槪要 = 26 2. 債權行爲의 無效 = 27 3. 物權行爲의 無效 = 28 4. 第3者 保