土地管理電算化 政策에 대한 使用者의 反應 分析 : 土地情報 體制의 評價를 中心으로

토지관리 전산화 정책과 토지정보체계에 대한 이용자 반응을 분석했다.

On the eve of the information Society, The proposition that information is the most important strategic resource, applies to a case of Pub1ic administration without exception. So, It has been the important problem to introduce the computerization into Public administration. Computerization in Public administration is introduced because It promises the expected technical payoffs that It produces the efficiency of Public administration. But to what extent have the promised technical payoffs been realized? The literature has given a variety of answers to this question, and the answers have often been is conflict.

this article seeks to overcome suck past deficiences in considering the technical payoffs from computerization in the case of land computerization. To achieve the above stated objectives, above all Be defined land computerization as the computer system which collect. process and use the land data or information for the public service or public policy making related to land use and management.

In Korea, This land computerization an in 1975 as a subsystem of Public Administration Networks, and have given public service t o the public since 1990, We divided the land computerization in korea into developing process and operating process, analyzed the processes empirically in the view of end-user in computerization, and find the results as follow: First, me analyzed the developing process of land computerization in terms of substantive rationality such as public interest, analytical rationality and procedural rationality, such as responsiveness, openess and participation.

The analysis proves that the end-users give positive response to the process generally , 'But the relatively negative responses is given t o the openess and participation. On the other hand, End-Users give negative response to the operating processes generally. Finally, End-Users give positive response to the expected results such as qualification of information, the efficiency of public service, controlling land-jobbers, and effective land policy making. On the basis of the above finding, we suggest several proposals, and there proposals are the elementary data which can seize the problems of on-going land computerization and raise the efficacy of land computerization policy.

However, in spite of these contributions, our study have defieiences in that our analysis stop at the level of descriptive statistics, and our sampling in problematic in terms of representation. These deficiences and problems are the subject which we shall overcome in the future study.