가로주택정비사업 활성화에 관한 연구 : 수도권을 중심으로

수도권 가로주택정비사업의 활성화 방안을 연구했다.

The Street Housing Improvement Project is a small-scale residential environment maintenance project in areas where the number of old and poor buildings is more than two-thirds of the total number of buildings while maintaining the previous street in a street area of less than 10,000 square meters (maximum 20,000 square meters allowed). The Street Housing Improvement Project was first introduced in 2012 through the revision of the Urban and Residential Environment Improvement Act, and since it is carried out on a small scale, it is faster than the existing readjustment project and has the advantage of increasing the resettlement rate of indigenous people.

The street housing readjustment project is a small-scale readjustment project introduced to lift the readjustment zone where the project cannot be carried out properly and quickly carry out the readjustment project as the existing large-scale maintenance project has deteriorated for investment rather than for the purpose of improving the residential environment, accelerating regional slumming due to conflicts among residents and delays in the project. The street housing readjustment project, first introduced in 2012, has rarely been completed despite various government measures to revitalize it.

Therefore, the purpose of this research is to contribute to the promotion of projects for the improvement of street houses and the improvement of resettlement rate of indigenous people, which is the original purpose of the street housing readjustment project by invigorating the street housing readjustment project. For the research on the revitalization of street housing readjustment project, this paper has made empirical analysis through Fuzzy-AHP for a group of experts and structural equation for residents, and the details are as follows.

First, the top five factors for the revitalization of the street housing readjustment project were derived by analyzing the importance through AHP and Fuzzy-AHP to a group of experts (projects, maintenance companies, academics, real estate agents, etc.).

Among the top five factors, mitigating the type of housing (currently limited to single-family housing and multi-family housing) was of the highest importance, followed by the eligibility requirements for issuing loan guarantees for small and medium-sized construction companies, the reinforcement of laws, the calculation of building-to-land ratio (excluding the calculation of the building-to-land ratio of parking lots, the obligation to install playgrounds for children, senior citizens, etc.).

Second, a survey was conducted on residents in areas where street housing readjustment projects were underway or could be carried out, and empirical analysis was conducted through a structural equation model. According to the analysis, the factors affecting the promotion of the street housing readjustment project were economic aspects, legal and institutional aspects, and facility aspects, while the factors affecting the residents' participation and migration aspects, awareness and interest, legal and institutional aspects, and facility aspects were shown in the order.

Based on the results of this study, I would like to suggest the following ways to promote the street housing readjustment project quickly and increase the rate of re-entry of indigenous people. First, the street housing readjustment project is possible in areas where more than two-thirds of old and defective buildings are located within the readjustment zone surrounded by street areas, and where the number of existing houses is more than 20 (10 single-family houses, 20 multi-family households). However, if various real estate other than housing coexist, it is not easy to proceed with the maintenance project due to the lack of smooth consultation among union members.

Therefore, it is necessary to seek ways to compensate for real estate that can gather opinions among members on various types of real estate in the readjustment zone. Second, support measures are needed for small and medium-sized private contractors. The government is giving various incentives such as increasing floor area ratio and loan support when working with public implementers such as Korea Land and Housing Corporation (LH).

However, as projects are often carried out through small and medium-sized contractors rather than co-implementation or construction of public institutions, funds needed for projects should be solved by supporting medium and small contractors with loan guarantees or utilizing medium and low-interest loans. Third, it is necessary to improve the awareness of the indigenous people about the street housing readjustment project. Street housing readjustment projects shall be approached with a concept of real-lifeism, not an investment, such as a large-scale readjustment project.

The government's support activities are needed so that indigenous people can recognize that the value of life can increase through local brand apartments in small and medium-sized complexes, not through the rise of value through large-sized brand apartments. Fourth, differential support measures based on location are needed. The reason why street housing maintenance projects are active in the Seoul metropolitan area is because of the influence of location.

Therefore, a good location should be supported by the government by raising the floor area ratio without conditions other than an increase in the floor area ratio through the supply of rental housing, and a bad location by raising the ratio of unsold or public rental housing. Fifth, support for the migration measures and additional contributions of the indigenous people is needed. It is necessary to prepare temporary residential housing for indigenous people during the construction of new houses after administrative disposition, but the recent regulation on mortgage loans has made it difficult to raise relocation costs and return deposits from existing tenants.

Therefore, the government should suppo