우리나라 個別公示地價制度 改善策에 관한 硏究

개별공시지가 제도의 운영상 문제와 개선방안을 연구했다.

The public land price system has played the role of the fundamental price in the land market and the core function of all-kinds of land systems, which was induced by "The Law of Public Land Price System and Land Evaluation" established in 1989 for the political purpose of actualizing the public land concept and unifying multiple public land price systems. But, actually, the market value of the land was not calculated efficiently in the evaluation of development profits which are the basic factor in inducing "the public land concept"( which means the land should be developed for the public profits and should not possessed by some people).

So this system has not factually been recognized as the controller between demands and supplies in the private and public sectors. Accordingly, since induction of the public land price system, there have occurred people's mistrust and arguments about evaluation methods and political effects of the system. There have always been conflicts in land compensation and land taxation system which are closely connected with people's property. Recently, the domestic real estate market has been opened to the foreign capital and new advanced real estate financing system has been introduced so that rapid changes have happened in the real estate market.

In the real estate evaluation system, there are demands of transformation of the existing evaluation methods to new system which is focused on the profitability. To cope with these changes, recently, there have been fundamental arguments and studies about the public land price system and evaluations which have basis on the existing real estate evaluation system. But the public land price system cannot change easily without confirmation of the alternatives' effects, because the public land price system has been playing not only symbolic roles in the land polices but also of price index in the real estate market.

At this time, I have inspected problems which have been discussed and introduced about the propriety of the public land price system in this thesis. Especially, the separate land price system has closely connected with people's properties in the point of land taxation system and all-kinds of burdens to land owners and occurred direct mistrust about the public land price system by double land price structure which is caused by the existing land price system . The double price structure has been operated because, since the standard land has been selected, the evaluated land has to been re-evaluated at the separate proper characteristics.

So I have tried to find efficient amendments which can improve propriety of the separate land price system without conflicting the existing institutional frames which are operated in the present. And I tried to propose the long-term improvement policies which can amend the existing the public land price system at a turning point in the real estate market. But I have some unsatisfied feeling about this thesis because I cannot pull myself out of the precedent arguments' range on this theme. I hope that I can observe this theme in a degree of a depth next time.