문화적 도시재생을 위한 법제 연구

문화적 도시재생을 위한 법제의 개선방안을 연구했다.

We now live in a culture period. Culture assimilates people as a member of a society and reproduces the society by educating the existing symbol systems and forms of life. By considering these in relation to culture and urban, culture can restore the function of underserved urban areas. Above this, residents will be able to keep the community through the 'symbiosis'. Korea is being performed in the name of urban regeneration with respect to existing city maintenance. Existing city maintenance made it difficult for indigenous people to resettle on their home ground, because of the policy about the development of high-density public housing and the supplier seeking development profits.

Then, it breaks with the history and culture of the local and the local community was dismantled. Thus, a new paradigm should be presented in urban regeneration beyond conventional ways of Urban Development. But legislation for the existing urban redevelopment defined as individual, piecemeal basis follows the traditional approach of Urban Development. It is difficult to realize the true meaning of urban regeneration through ‘a special law on urban regeneration activation and support’ enacted in December 2013.

That’s because it is legislation to ‘activate’ the urban regeneration rather than the law relating to ‘urban regeneration’ If so, in order to solve this problem, first, it is necessary to establish the role between urban regeneration law and urban renewal law. That is, we enact a Standard Law and it would be desirable to make a specific law with respect to the details. Second, the concept of culture should be included in the urban regeneration concept. Cultural urban regeneration should serve as a realizable means of social rights on the Constitution in Article 34 and Article 35.

Therefore it should be to restore the community of the city by utilizing tangible and intangible cultural resources and taking advantage of the unique history and characteristics of the region, on the social rights to realize a human being with comfortable environment to meet people's minimum needs. Third, local governments should be the center in urban regeneration. It has to stipulate planning and cultural sovereignty in the Constitution or the specific identification and implement urban regeneration around local governments. Affairs of central administration organization should be handed over to the local government center.

Except for special cases, affairs delegated by the head of the administration will have to be abolished. In conclusion, cultural urban regeneration has to be achieved by restoration of community of the city not just urban regeneration culturally.