再建築한 建物의 法定地上權 및 民事執行法上 地位 = Legal superficies of reconstruction buildings and legal position of civil execution act

재건축 건물의 법정지상권과 민사집행상 지위를 연구했다.

In our legislation land and buildings are treated as a separated real estate. Building must accompany utilization relation about the land from the nature of the matter. If superficies can not be formed, social and economical disadvantage is happened with removed building. Under civil law 366, when the land and building belong to the each other owner by auction of pledge, the superficies is legally justly admitted. That superficies is called the legal superficies. Legal superficies is a peculiar system that regulates utilization relation of land and building.

But by the article 366, it is not clear when the legal superficies is established and not concrete what situation and conditions are necessary. The Supreme Court of korea abandoned its long sustained precedents and held that the owner on the reconstructed building was denied of the Legal Superficies, which means the new owner of the land who purchased it through auction might claim the removal of the building. Mentioning the socio-economical background of the decision, agrees with the Supreme Court of Korea on that the past ruling needed to be changed anyway and the new ruling can be helpful and effective for the globalism and modernization of the Korean mortgage law.

But bulk auction might have been the better option for the Supreme Court of Korea. If we use bulk auction right the relationship between the parties might be much more simple and clear because the building and the land definitely belongs to the same person after the auction. It is beneficial to him or her as well because to bo auctioned is better than to be removed. It is to be noted that the one of the characteristics of the Korean property law is that the land and the building on it may belong to different persons. The main purpose of legal superficies is to guarantee utilization of land for the owner of building.

the existence of legal superficies to the land purchased by auction is very important for the legal position of buyer of land. It is to be noted that the one of the characteristics of the Korean property law is that the land and the building on it may belong to different persons. The use of the bulk auction right could be better solution to avoid it.

Ⅰ. 서론 = 1 Ⅱ. 법정지상권의 성립요건 = 3 1. 저당권설정 당시에 건물이 존재할 것 = 3 (1) 나대지에 저당권설정과 법정지상권 = 4 1) 학설 = 4 (가) 부정설 = 4 (나) 긍정설 = 5 2) 판례 = 6 3) 검토 = 6 (2) 저당권설정 당시 건축 중인 건물의 법정지상권 성립 여부 = 8 1) 학설 = 8 2) 판례 = 9 3) 검토 = 9 (3) 토지저당권자가 건물 축조를 승인한 경우 = 10 1) 학설 = 11 (가) 부정설 = 11 (나) 긍정설 = 11 2) 판례 = 12 3) 검토 = 12 (4) 건물신축 후 설정된 후순위 토지저당권의 실행과 법정지상권 = 13 (5) 토지저당권설정 후 신축 건물에 설정된 저당권의 실행과 법정지상권 = 13 (6) 건물에 대한 보존등기의 여부 = 14 (7) 이른바 담보지상권 = 15 1) 내용 = 15 (가) 지상권설정자 = 15 (나) 담보지상권자 = 15 (다) 담보지상권과 경매 = 16 (라) 담보지상권과 법정지상권 = 16 2. 토지와 건물이 동일인의 소유에 속할 것 = 16 (1) 소유자의 동일성에 관한 문제 = 16 (2) 소유자가 가족인 경우 = 18 (3) 공유의 경우 = 18 (4) 저당권설정 전에 가등기가 있는 경우 = 19 (5) 저당권설정 후에 토지와 건물이 각기 다른 소유자로 변동된 경우 = 20 3. 저당권의 설정 = 20 4. 경매의 결과 토지와 건물의 소유자가 달라질 것 = 21 5. 특약에 의하여 성립을 배제할 수 있는지 여부 = 22 Ⅲ. 법정지상권의 성립시기와 등기 = 23 1. 성립시기 = 23 2. 등기와